News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Roo culling has residents hopping mad 

Roo culling has residents hopping mad

09 Nov, 2010 12:00 AM
A GROUP of Panton Hill residents has appealed to the Department of Sustainability and Environment to review its kangaroo culling permit system, calling it flawed and poorly policed.

Janice Crosswhite, speaking on behalf of five other Panton Hill residents, said the DSE's Authority to Control Wildlife permits were being approved without proper verification, leaving the system open to misuse.

"The DSE process is seriously flawed and needs changes in order to meet the current needs of Victorians, particularly those living in outer-suburban Melbourne and on smaller rural holdings," Ms Crosswhite said.

"We have also learned that the DSE is not following existing policies and procedures. We also wish to see demonstrable improvement in the DSE's administration of the process, its accountability and the implementation of a review mechanism to ensure the decisions made are suited to the particular circumstances in each case."

The residents have sent a detailed submission to Minister for Environment Gavin Jennings stating that the DSE should consider neighbours and whether they supported a cull.

They also want neighbours to have 14 days to appeal an ACWP and have requested an immediate ban on culls in Nillumbik while the review takes place.

The group's actions were motivated by an incident in April, when the DSE granted a permit for a Panton Hill resident to cull kangaroos on her property.

Neighbours, including Ms Crosswhite, protested, saying the DSE had failed to take into account the fact that neighbouring properties were opposed to

the cull.

Due to caretaker provisions leading up to the state election, the DSE declined to comment. DSE spokesman Nick Talbot has previously stated the permits are considered on a "case-by-case" basis, and are a last resort.

Should the DSE review its kangaroo culling permit system? Post a comment to this story below.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
My goodness not again - sick of hearing about Kangaroos being culled. Leave the poor things alone; they are our Australin emblem. Just goes to show what you think of Australia and if they are on some one else's property leave them alone. You have no right to shoot on other people's property. This has gone beyond a joke. It makes me so cranky to think that people can harm a defenseless animal.
Posted by Donna, 9/11/2010 6:27:52 PM, on Banyule and Nillumbik Weekly
How dare the DSE treat our native animals as pests to be eradicated when they are supposed to be the protectors of our environment and native animals! They are determined to eradicate wildlife from Victoria and make it sterile for more land subdivisions and developments. The Brumby government is anti-environment and only want people and profits, not kangaroos!
Posted by VivKay, 9/11/2010 10:23:50 PM, on Banyule and Nillumbik Weekly
There should be a Review of DSE's Authority To Control Wildlife (ATCW) system, and an investigation into DSE itself for failing to protect OUR wildlife, which rely on them for protection. What is needed is an expose into the entire Department since Chloe Munroe declared that agricultre should dominate everthing and the environment rates second best. DSE is the reason for the loss of biodiversity and the minister looks a fool. But who can we trust any longer to do the right thing? One thing is certain, the poor kangaroos should not be scapegoats. SAVE OUR ROOS!!!
Posted by Maryland Wilson, 10/11/2010 8:29:50 AM, on Banyule and Nillumbik Weekly
What part of the the "Wnvironment" in the DSE is it that they don't understand? Kangaroos are native animals, part of our biodiversity, and the values that make up our landscape. They are not a "pest" species but an integral part of our native grassland and woodland ecology, and they have a positive role to play. The Pantom Hill community obviously appreciate their natural surrounding and have "adopted" the wildlife there. How dare the DSE allow permits to kill them when it is their job to fulfill and protect our native animals, not "control" them to death!
Posted by Milly O, 10/11/2010 8:31:59 AM, on Banyule and Nillumbik Weekly
The processes that DSE undertake to issue cull permits for kangaroos is seriously flawed and due investigation of the worthiness of the application to cull is veryvery rarely undertaken. Permits are often issued with no inspection of the property in question, no consideration of the social status and season of the kangaroos and no consideration of how others may feel about the cull - especially neighbours. People have to jump through far more hoops to remove a tree or build a shed - how can it be so easy to kill kangaroos?
Posted by Gayle C, 10/11/2010 1:45:57 PM, on Banyule and Nillumbik Weekly
Kangaroo steak meat next to the vegies... mmm very yumee.
Posted by tica 223, 10/11/2010 2:50:51 PM, on Banyule and Nillumbik Weekly
DSE guidelines for the issuing of ATCWs are rarely adhered to as they do not have enough staff to do so. This is no excuse however, for if they cannot find the time to inspect a property before issuing a permit, they should not be issuing one at all. ATCWs are not looked at on a "case-by-case" basis and, the most important thing of all, they are issued with NO consultation with neighbouring properties at all. Take for example a case last year where a kangaroo culling permit was issued for a property right next door to a wildlife shelter. Was the shelter advised before issuing? Was the property inspected before issuing? Was the landowner advised about pasture improvement? Was the kangaroo population assessed? No to all of these questions. To add salt to the wound - the wildlife shelter had been in operation at that location for 10 years, the neighbour arrived but two years prior to the request for a culling permit and his main income was not from the land. The property concerned is also surrounded by a national park on two sides. The first and most important guideline DSE should be following is CONSULTATION with neighbouring properties BEFORE issuing a culling permit.
Posted by Carola, 10/11/2010 8:10:45 PM, on Banyule and Nillumbik Weekly
What the hell has the Invasive Animals CRC got to do with encouraging kangaroos to be 'culled'? There is a reference to this in the previous article titled WATCH OUT Roos on the Run.

On searching invasiveanimals.com and ending up at http://www.feral.org.au/feral-species/ I see that they are saying that kangaroos and possums are feral animals!!

The Bureau of Rural Sciences is backing them up. How can they regard themselves as scientific then put out this illogical, incorrect propaganda designed to make people hate our national icon?

Humans are the ferals, not the natives that have been here millions of years.

Time to expose the racket driving kangaroos and all our native species to extinction under the guise of them being pests - just because we can't learn to live in harmony with them.

Pathetic.

Posted by Menkit, 11/11/2010 3:44:27 AM, on Banyule and Nillumbik Weekly
What a joke, of course they should review their system.

We don't know how lucky we are to have these beautiful animals amongst us. We are already losing them to habitat loss, being hit by vehicles, dog attacks, human attacks, the list goes on.

And besides, to cull means to remove the weak. These kangaroos aren't being culled, they're being killed.


Posted by bel, 11/11/2010 7:55:23 PM, on Banyule and Nillumbik Weekly

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


Banyule & Nillumbik Weekly


Banyule and Nillumbik Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...